Friday, September 7, 2018

The Being - 1983

I had a bit of a movie marathon last night.  I was sick, just wanted to go home and relax.  I specifically wanted to make popcorn and watch 80's cheese.  And in doing so, I spent the last 40 or so minutes at work updating my amazon watch queue with sleaze.  I added the previous entry Rats: Night of Terror and this, The Being.  I also added the early Mario Bava feature Caltiki, which I did not finish.  Too tired, I went to bed about 10:15.  I'm sick, give me a break.

The Being is one of these typical monster films that for whatever reason feels super fucking disjointed and odd.  First of all there must be a story behind the director Jackie Kong, who had never made anything before and for her first film secured a pretty good cast and budget.  Then the actual movie.  It felt like a weird walk-the-line sort of mix between hammy, terrible, and just plain boring.  Nothing quite took center stage, in terms of what I felt the most coming from the movie.  In short I watched the whole thing and came away from it pretty disappointed.

The Being takes place on Easter, and did start me on a brief diversion of looking up holiday themed horror movies.  I remember watching the significantly terrible Serial Rabbit and several of it's sequels.  What can I say....  I was put on this planet for a reason.

The Being fucking sucked.  Let's just fast forward this review.  What you have is a hard to follow plot about a weird ass monster killing people, and while it should be typical 80's fare, somehow it just didn't ever find it's stride.  Most of the movie rode a weird line between self-aware, cheesy to the point of ridiculousness, and tedium at it's worse.  To say I liked it...would just be a straight lie.

Ummm....  Yeah.  I dunno.  I can't say I have a lot to say about this one.  Cool monster I guess.  But like the movie, it feels like they just tried too hard, and the end result is self aware, too silly, and just somehow didn't work given the material.
"Is that a... coupon?  You should've told me you had a coupon at the beginning of the transaction."

Rats: Night of Terror - 1984

There's not a enough of the typically known cult films on here.  Since I called myself Grindhouse review, one would not think this to be the case.  One would be wrong.  Let's face it....  Where I am concerned, I just can't stick to one thing.  Side note:  I recently had sex with a guy again.  It didn't go too well.  Made me question if this is what I'm into.  If I can't even stick to a sexuality, what can I stick to?  It begs the question.

Rats: Night of Terror is a film which I had confused for a long time with other rat themed movies. Who knows which of those movies I've seen.  All I know is I remembered one specific scene:  a group of like 3-4 people in a dark basement room, somewhere, and finding a rat king.  I'm just going link happy today.  Since I'm on a roll, check out the other movies by Bruno Mattei I've reviewed!  Please note that in my review of Shocking Dark, I said I'd seen Rats before.  And, I might've!  Who knows really.

Rats: Night of Terror is a quintessential post-apocalypse 80's flick.  This is what the standard definition would be.  Something like Def-Con 4 and this movie belong in the same vein, they're basically blood brothers or something.  It's chalk full of post-apocalypse stereotypes.  It's the year 225 AB (After the Bomb) and the destroyed world split into two groups:  those underground and those above ground.  Some people from above ground discover one of the underground bases, and despite their superior technology and innovation, somehow they're all dead.  In the meantime, seems to be a whole lot of rats scurrying around.  Could the two be related?

Well, the answer is yes obviously.  Look at the title of the movie.  But the stereotypes don't stop there.  You have:  1 bad dubbing 2 insane looking characters 3 ridiculous names for the characters like Video and Taurus, Duke and Chocolate 4 ridiculous acting choices 5 awesome music 6 well paced action 7 eerily good and practical effects 8 nudity 9 terrible humor 10 riffability, and more.

I can't say if this movie is as memorable as some other Mattei flicks.  This I would have to say might be his best known...?  Actually according to lists I've found it's Hell of the Living Dead.  Man, just a small typo and the title Hello the Living Dead comes up.  I'm sorry, but, I want to see the movie Hello the Living Dead a lot more.  If that's not a movie it should fucking be.

I am not sure what else to say about Rats.  I'd say that of the now 4 Mattei movies I've tracked in here, I liked Shocking Dark more, and Women's Prison Massacre was very different, and enjoyable in it's own way.  This one is definitely great too.  I'd love to see more and rate them all.  On second thought, I do think Women's Prison Massacre deserves about 3 or 3.5 stars.  This movie... hm.  I feel inclined to only give it 4.  So what the heck.  4 stars.  And it got a full star for the awesome ending.


Wednesday, September 5, 2018

Marebito - 2004

This one is going to be random.  First of all, there is not a lot of Asian horror on this blog, and it was a topic that for quite a while interested me a lot.  I used to rent anything from the video store that had the wonderful Tartan Asia Extreme label on it.
It's like seeing an old friend...

I google image search Tartan Asia Extreme, and so many flicks I saw come flooding back.  There is something about specifically early 2000's Japanese horror films that was gold.  I mean, don't take just my word for it, that was when things like The Ring, The Eye, The Grudge, Dark Water, Pulse, One Missed Call and more were adapted into awful US remakes and distributed here.  For a while, those movies were simply put:  The Shit.

There is something about the understated and ambiguous approach had by these films that simply made them a wonder to watch when I was about 16-21.  I remember watching such films as the well known Audition and Battle Royale, and unknown movies such as the Korean film H and R-Point.  I was all over that shit, to break it down for ya.

I may or may not have seen Marebito at that point in my life.  Parts of it certainly felt familiar.  I never kept very good track of what I've seen in my life at all, which was part of my inspiration to start this blog in general.  God fucking knows how many of these goddamn movies I've seen, how many I forgot, and how many I'll end up seeing twice for that very reason.

Marebito is directed by Takashi Shimizu who did The Grudge, and it stars director and actor Shin'ya Tsukamoto as a quiet cameraman who's sort of sucked into a web of darkness and weird stuff after witnessing a man kill himself.  He sees that the man was terrified, perhaps of what he was seeing.  He has a vague sort of internal quest to become as terrified as the man must've been, and embarks to discover what was terrifying him.  This leads him to the arguably symbolic discovery of a unknown woman he finds chained to a wall in the "underworld" who only drinks blood and can't speak.

It's a largely hallucinatory surreal quest where some parts are wisely left ambiguous, some things are explained, and some are only touched on to never be addressed again.  The truth of the whole film is arguably unimportant, because in the end it's a slow burn horror-ish type film meant to unsettle, and in this goal it was successful.  

Tsukamoto's character is very undeveloped and at times his motivation unclear, however through a good script and good acting, he somehow pulls of a very interesting main character who we can't help but feel a strange connection to.  The music is phenomenal, and the movie goes by quickly for something which is essentially extremely slow, where very little ends up happening in the end. 

Does it scare?  I would argue that it does.  This is not the jumpscare type, nor is it gory or violent.  It's a slow burn, and the scares are simply more of the unsettling type.  If one was to watch this late at night, unsure of what one was getting into, I could see it being very unsettling.  The imagery is bizarre, and lingers with you.  It's also something which one would tend to think about after viewing it, given all the unanswered questions and interesting plot points touched on.  

But at the same time, it wasn't ALL that good.  It felt a bit undeveloped, and there was certainly a lot of style over substance.  I think it felt at times like they were just filming things "just cause" and that there wasn't much of a real script or idea they were working with....  And despite liking it, I still feel inclined to give it about 3 stars.  It's a great idea!  I could see it being better, however.  

Sleepstalker - 1989

 The first movie about the fairy tale character of the Sandman came out in 1933, the most recent in 2017.  Obviously a character of some sta...