Also known as Bakterion, Monster of Blood, and Zombie 4.
I was composing this whole thing in my head for a lead in to this review about what makes movies good, or at least better, than others. I don't feel like I need to exactly spell it out for you though. Memorable characters, smart dialogue, cinematography, like if you don't know this stuff than watch more movies.
But the reason I was thinking this was because a lot of the zombie movies I've been watching have had nothing really worth mentioning, and that another way of saying that none of those things I mentioned or the other commonly held aspects of what make a movie stand out were present. Thus, those without the standout parts have to be evaluated more upon things like effects, or pace, or even just something like "well, how bored were you? Really bored? Or only kinda bored?"
I'm trying in a roundabout way to determine why I liked Panic more than some of these others. What can I say, it had some standout sequences, a cool ending, good effects, some topless (and bottomless) female nudity... I mean maybe this is part of criticism, which is to say overall I'm sure its hard to make a movie, but also we're not asking for that much. It just has to grab us in some way and more often than not that can be relatively up to you the filmmaker to give us whatever, as long as its something.
So in that way Panic stands out and overachieves in just a small way, not as big as some, but it is good. In the scope of lookalike zombie movies, see this one. 4 stars.









