At some point about 15 minutes into Robot Pilot I actually said to myself, "Is this a movie about remote controlled airplanes?" You see, like many 40's films, it moves at the pace of your average laden down adult banana slug. Despite being a "Screwball comedy" that the Variety magazine said had "sex appeal". Really?! This film has sex appeal? Well someone has a weird definition of sex appeal then.
Robot Pilot is about a great new invention, a gizmo that can control toy airplanes from the ground. They demonstrate this to massive quantities by showing people controlling a regular sized remote control plane and then heavily implying that it could be done with the full size real planes. It's basically as corny as it sounds. It's a regular fun thrilled romp as they fly little planes around, and us as the audience stare with jaws dropped that such an invention exists.
Remote controlled planes are, as you know, the epitome of human society and invention. Seeing a plane that's about 8-10 inches big fly around without a pilot? Especially since that plane is controlled by a machine they have to lug around in the bed of a truck that looks like it weighs about 500 pounds and is the size of a regular sized man? It's downright astounding what mankind can make these days.
But I jest. I'm sure that at the time, this was very eye opening. Planes hadn't been around super long, a large percentage of people had never set foot in a regular size plane, and now they were controlling miniature ones from afar? What was NEXT? The idea of controlling full size planes must have seemed fantastic but also so plausible. So you throw in half a plot about two girls who commit a crime of stealing gas, and you throw in some sort of Ruskie or something that wants to steal the invention for Communism.
This movie is not going to be attracting a new audience or anything as time goes on. It was included on my boxset I've been watching....which is a secret for now cause I am not promising to finish it. I have so many things to do, sorry yo.
Oh I do want to mention the extreme racism. The fat Mexican idiot, played by an Italian guy, who's name is Pedro. At one point a woman who doesn't know him says "Hey Pedro!" He's like "How did you know my name was Pedro?" She literally said something like "You're Mexican, you're all named Pedro," or something along those lines. And then he laughed and was like, "Oh yeah! You're right!" It was a stellar, accurate, and compelling moment. Such realistic script writing has sadly been lost to times. Modern movies would have you believe that Mexican people are unique individuals who aren't self hating, but that's where modern movies suck.
I suppose it was entertaining. In a way. But also paper thin, bland, and never needed to happen. I give it 2.
Monday, October 23, 2017
Friday, October 20, 2017
Island of Death - 1976
So, this is interesting. I didn't exactly plan to do a marathon of movies from 1976. I think I might plan on keeping it going too. I like it, it's a theme. I wonder if conceivably I could watch 1976 movies from now until I turn 40 in 2026? I suppose I could of course. Google tells me the top movies of 1976 were Rocky, Taxi Driver, The Omen, Carrie, and Marathon Man. I've seen every one of those movies. By the way how did Rocky win the Oscar over Taxi Driver?!
Island of Death is an exploitation film, the kind of film that deserves the term exploitation, and the kind of film that even 41 years old is shocking to see. There's a paper thin plot about a man and woman duo that come to the island of Mikonos in Greece and they start killing people who they find fit their definition of "sexual deviants and perverts". Of course the man and woman themselves are the true deviants, raping and fucking anything that moves including a goat.
There's graphic scenes of watersports, bestiality, lesbianism, some gay kissing, and plenty of good old fashioned full frontal nudity filling in the corners. Also, the murders come along pretty early on and they are average to great in terms of blood and graphic content. Island of Death reminded me a lot of...uh fill this in later cause I don't remember. (I was trying to remember Blood Sucking Freaks) Anyways, they were both older movies that were still quite graphic and indeed shocking.
Island of Death has a slow pacing, at an hour and 45 minutes it's definitely overly long, and very many of these scenes could have been cut. It's not bad, and it is interesting most definitely, however I still think some editing could have been utilized.
What else....the music was interesting. A fun mix of weird 70's pop and then original weird music no doubt made by someone who had basically no other IMDb credits. (*the blog author checks his intuition) Yup I was right, a total of 3 movies composed, this being the first one. Sooooo. In the end what is this? It's a product of it's time, it's interesting, and I would recommend it for sure. It's very sexual, it is arousing, and it is still shockingly violent and bizarre. It's creepy, atmospheric, and well acted. So in that case I'll give it a 4 star rating.
Island of Death is an exploitation film, the kind of film that deserves the term exploitation, and the kind of film that even 41 years old is shocking to see. There's a paper thin plot about a man and woman duo that come to the island of Mikonos in Greece and they start killing people who they find fit their definition of "sexual deviants and perverts". Of course the man and woman themselves are the true deviants, raping and fucking anything that moves including a goat.
There's graphic scenes of watersports, bestiality, lesbianism, some gay kissing, and plenty of good old fashioned full frontal nudity filling in the corners. Also, the murders come along pretty early on and they are average to great in terms of blood and graphic content. Island of Death reminded me a lot of...uh fill this in later cause I don't remember. (I was trying to remember Blood Sucking Freaks) Anyways, they were both older movies that were still quite graphic and indeed shocking.
Island of Death has a slow pacing, at an hour and 45 minutes it's definitely overly long, and very many of these scenes could have been cut. It's not bad, and it is interesting most definitely, however I still think some editing could have been utilized.
What else....the music was interesting. A fun mix of weird 70's pop and then original weird music no doubt made by someone who had basically no other IMDb credits. (*the blog author checks his intuition) Yup I was right, a total of 3 movies composed, this being the first one. Sooooo. In the end what is this? It's a product of it's time, it's interesting, and I would recommend it for sure. It's very sexual, it is arousing, and it is still shockingly violent and bizarre. It's creepy, atmospheric, and well acted. So in that case I'll give it a 4 star rating.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Sleepstalker - 1989
The first movie about the fairy tale character of the Sandman came out in 1933, the most recent in 2017. Obviously a character of some sta...
-
I'm so close I can taste it! Reboot tomorrow and I'm done with this series. So for lucky number 10, well what do they do? They ha...
-
Man, its weird to think that Saw is officially 20 years old this year! Both seems like too long and too short given it has ten sequels. F...